Dr. J, or Julius Erving, made waves with his comments comparing himself and Larry Bird, stating, “Even Draymond was a better 3-point shooter than Bird; how much more myself.” This remark sparked a heated discussion among basketball fans and analysts, given the legacies and differing styles of play of both Erving and Bird.
Julius Erving is renowned for his above-the-rim prowess, athleticism, and influence on the game’s style during his career. As a forward, Dr. J dominated with his dunks, drives, and mid-range game, which became hallmarks of his time with the ABA’s Virginia Squires and New York Nets, as well as the NBA’s Philadelphia 76ers. His skill set helped bridge the ABA and NBA, earning him a lasting legacy as one of the game’s greatest pioneers.
Larry Bird, on the other hand, is celebrated for his shooting, playmaking, and basketball IQ. Playing for the Boston Celtics, Bird’s sharpshooting and versatility were pivotal in leading the team to three NBA championships in the 1980s. Bird was known for his remarkable shooting ability, including his proficiency from beyond the arc, earning three consecutive 3-point shooting contest titles during All-Star Weekend.
Dr. J’s comparison hinges on the evolving nature of the game and the role of the 3-point shot. In Bird’s era, the 3-pointer was not as emphasized as it is in today’s game. Bird made 649 career 3-pointers at a 37.6% shooting percentage, impressive for his time. In contrast, modern players like Draymond Green operate in an era where the 3-point shot is a more integral part of the game. Green, known more for his defense and playmaking than his shooting, has made more 3-pointers than Bird, although with a lower shooting percentage of 31.4% as of the end of the 2023 season.
Dr. J’s claim about his own 3-point shooting can be contextualized by considering the era in which he played. The 3-point line was introduced during Erving’s career, but it was not a focal point of his game. Dr. J attempted only 495 3-pointers in his NBA career, making 25.0% of them. His statement could be interpreted as emphasizing the different skill sets and era-specific strategies that defined his and Bird’s careers.
Fans’ reactions to Dr. J’s comments reflect the ongoing debates about comparing players across different eras. Some argue that Erving’s athleticism and overall impact on the game make him one of the greatest, irrespective of his 3-point shooting. Others highlight Bird’s all-around game and clutch performances, asserting that his shooting and playmaking make him superior in certain aspects.
In essence, Dr. J’s remarks have ignited discussions about the evolution of basketball and the changing emphasis on different skills over time. While Draymond Green’s and Julius Erving’s 3-point shooting may not eclipse Bird’s legacy in that domain, the comparison underscores the varying strengths each player brought to the game. Bird’s shooting, Erving’s athleticism, and Green’s versatility all contribute to their unique legacies.
Ultimately, debates about player comparisons often highlight the subjective nature of evaluating greatness. Erving’s comments serve as a reminder of the diverse skills that contribute to a player’s impact on the game and the importance of context when comparing legends from different eras. Fans and analysts will continue to discuss and celebrate the unique contributions of players like Dr. J and Larry Bird, each of whom has left an indelible mark on the sport of basketball.
